Assault charges in Canada are graded across Sections 265 to 273 of the Criminal Code, with maximum penalties running from six months to life imprisonment depending on which section Crown elects. Julian Van Der Walle defends assault files across the Okanagan, Shuswap, and Kootenays. Free consultation.
The Criminal Code defines assault in Section 265 and creates an escalating ladder of offences from there. Common assault under Section 266 covers the baseline conduct. Assault with a weapon and assault causing bodily harm both sit under Section 267. Aggravated assault under Section 268 covers wounding, maiming, disfiguring, or endangering life. Sexual assault under Sections 271, 272, and 273 runs as a parallel track. Each section carries its own evidence requirements and its own defences. Julian Van Der Walle handles assault defence across Vernon, Kelowna, Penticton, Salmon Arm, and the BC Interior.
The most common assault charge prosecuted at the Vernon Law Courts. Covers any intentional application of force without consent, or threatening conduct that causes a reasonable fear of imminent force. Prosecuted by summary conviction (max 2 years) or indictment (max 5 years). Related offences
Applies when an assault results in injuries that interfere with the complainant's health or comfort beyond the merely transient. Crown Counsel in Vernon must prove both the intentional force and the resulting harm. Maximum sentence of 10 years on indictment. Defence options
The most serious assault classification under the Criminal Code. Charged when the complainant is wounded, maimed, disfigured, or their life is endangered. Carries a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment and is always prosecuted by indictment.
Assault involving a spouse, partner, or family member receives heightened scrutiny from Crown prosecutors in Vernon and the Okanagan. Mandatory charging policies, no-contact bail conditions, and specialized domestic violence courts all apply. Other charges
An assault charge that starts as a serious file can often be downgraded, withdrawn, or won at trial. The defence position is built from the disclosure: police notes, witness statements, 911 audio, body-worn camera footage where available, medical records, and any video from the location. Inconsistencies in the complainant’s statements, gaps in the police record, mutual injuries, and intoxication on the complainant’s side are all routinely productive defence vectors.
The early conversation with a defence lawyer matters because Crown sets their position early. A file that starts as Section 267 assault with a weapon based on Crown’s reading of the disclosure can be argued down to common assault, can sometimes be withdrawn entirely on a pre-charge basis where the file is weak, and can in other cases be resolved with a peace bond under Section 810 that avoids a criminal record altogether.
Julian Van Der Walle appears at the Vernon Law Courts and the Kelowna Law Courts regularly on assault files. The early defence work is what shapes the outcome.
Julian has secured acquittals, charge withdrawals, and reduced sentences for assault clients across the Okanagan. He has exposed flaws in Crown evidence, challenged unlawful police conduct, and negotiated favourable resolutions at the Vernon Law Courts.
Julian handles every assault file himself from initial consultation through to resolution. You will never be passed to a junior lawyer or paralegal. Your defence strategy receives his full focus, and you have direct access to your lawyer throughout the case.
Years of daily practice at the Vernon Law Courts means Julian knows local Crown prosecutors, understands court scheduling, and recognizes which defence strategies are most effective in this jurisdiction. That local knowledge translates directly into stronger outcomes.
Maximum penalties under the Criminal Code for the main assault offences are set out in each section. Actual sentences imposed by BC courts run well below the maximum for first-time offenders with no aggravating factors.
Common assault (Section 266). Hybrid offence. Maximum five years on indictment, two years less a day on summary conviction. First-time files often resolve with a conditional discharge or suspended sentence with probation.
Assault with a weapon (Section 267(a)). Use or threat of use of a weapon, broadly defined to include any object used as a weapon. Maximum 10 years on indictment, 18 months summary. Custodial sentences common where the weapon was a firearm or where actual injury resulted.
Assault causing bodily harm (Section 267(b)). Bodily harm that interferes with health or comfort and is more than trifling. Maximum 10 years on indictment, 18 months summary. Most BC files in this section involve visible injuries and result in custodial or conditional sentences.
Aggravated assault (Section 268). Wounding, maiming, disfiguring, or endangering the life of the complainant. Maximum 14 years on indictment only (no summary option). Custodial sentences are the norm.
Assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm (Section 272). Where a weapon was used or bodily harm caused in the course of a sexual assault. Maximum 14 years on indictment, life imprisonment where a firearm was used and the offence was committed for the benefit of a criminal organization.
Sentencing factors under Section 718.2. Aggravating factors include abuse of a position of trust or authority, abuse of a child under 18, abuse of a domestic partner, the use of a weapon, and prior convictions for similar offences. Mitigating factors include genuine remorse, early guilty plea, no prior record, mental health or addiction connected to the offending, and Gladue factors for Indigenous accused.
Assault files in BC have a real defence inventory that depends on the facts. The most frequently raised is self-defence.
Self-defence under Section 34. Parliament rewrote the self-defence provisions in 2013 through Bill C-26. The current Section 34 has a three-part test: the accused believed on reasonable grounds that force was being used or threatened against them, the act was committed for the purpose of defending against the use or threat of force, and the act was reasonable in the circumstances. The Supreme Court of Canada elaborated on the framework in R v Khill, 2021 SCC 37. Self-defence is one of the most productive defences on common assault files in BC.
Defence of property (Section 35). A separate but related defence where the accused was protecting property they were lawfully in possession of. The test mirrors Section 34 with adjustments for the property context.
Consent. Where the complainant consented to the conduct (mutual combat, contact sport, certain medical procedures), the actus reus of assault can be defeated. Consent has limits: a person cannot consent to bodily harm in a non-sport context, and consent obtained through fraud or duress is not valid.
Provocation. Not a complete defence but a sentencing factor that can reduce exposure where the complainant’s conduct triggered the response.
Charter applications. Section 8 challenges to the search that produced evidence, Section 9 challenges to the lawfulness of the arrest, Section 10(b) challenges to denial of access to counsel, and Section 11(b) applications based on unreasonable delay all come up in assault files. Successful Charter applications can lead to evidence exclusion or stays of proceedings.
Trial strategy and Crown overcharging. Crown often overcharges on assault files. Identifying the right charge for the actual conduct (downgrading from 267(b) to 266 where the bodily harm was minor, for example) is part of the early defence work. Julian Van Der Walle handles this negotiation routinely at the Vernon Law Courts and the Kelowna Law Courts.
Every case begins with a private, judgment-free consultation. We review the details of your charges, examine disclosure, and discuss your version of events. You’ll receive clear, straightforward guidance about your legal position, potential outcomes, and the best path forward so you can make informed decisions.
No two cases are the same, which is why your defence is carefully tailored to your circumstances. We analyze evidence, identify weaknesses in the Crown’s case, explore Charter issues, and develop a focused legal strategy designed to protect your rights and achieve the strongest possible result.
From negotiations to trial, your case is handled with preparation and determination. We advocate firmly on your behalf, challenge evidence where appropriate, and pursue every available legal avenue. Throughout the process, you remain informed, supported, and confident in the defence being presented.
Or fill out the form below to receive a free and confidential initial consultation.
If you have been criminally charged and are not sure what to do, you need to get competent legal representation right away.
© 2026 Vernon Criminal Defence | All Rights Reserved