The Queen v. B.(R.) 2015 #2
The same client mentioned below was charged again with three counts of possession for the purposes of trafficking. She had been arrested and searched a few days after being released on bail for the charges mentioned in the entry below. Again, Mr. van der Walle provided notice to the prosecutor of his Constitutional defense about 60 days before the trial. Again, Mr. van der Walle argued that his client had been illegally arrested and searched. And again, the prosecutor agreed. The charges were resolved with stay of proceedings before the trial. In the end, the client had been charged with six drug offences and was not convicted of a single offence. One happy client….
Related Stories
The King v. W.(A.) 2024
The client agreed to loan woman whom he had previously had sexual relations with a $100 loan to help her make rent for the month at her apartment in Penticton BC. The woman flirted with the client prior to his arrival at her apartment to give her the money by sending...
The King v. L.(K.) 2024
The client was pulled over by police after being observed weaving late at night on the highway near Kelowna BC. The officer smelled alcohol and had the client blow into a roadside device. The device registered a "fail" reading and the client was arrested and taken...
The King v. S.(M.) 2024
The client was driving down a residential street in Kelowna when she collided with a parked car. The police came to the scene and noted symptoms of impairment. They detained the client for impaired driving and made a breath demand on her. She ended up blowing well...
REQUEST A FREE CONSULTATION
Call 1.877.212.9645
Or fill out the form below to receive a free and confidential initial consultation.