Google 4.8 ★ | CALL ME (24/7) 1-877-212-9645
In Kelowna, after the belated Canada Day fireworks, an experienced police officer was heading back to the detachment to finish off his shift and saw the client’s vehicle pull out of a gravel parking lot.  The officer decided to randomly stop the vehicle to check driver sobriety, which he is lawfully able to do.  Once the vehicle was pulled over, the officer observed an odour of alcohol on  the breath of the client and demanded that she perform a roadside breathalyzer test.  She failed.  Prior to leaving the scene the officer let the client back into her vehicle to get her purse and at that time the officer observed the client try to hide a small flask under the passenger seat.  The officer ended up taking the client back to the police station where she provided samples of her breath well over the legal limit.  She was charged accordingly.  On the first day of trial Mr. van der Walle cross examined the police officer with a view to trying to establish that the combination of the fact that the client had possessed a flask in her car combined with the fact she tried to hide it from the officer created more than a “mere possibility” that she had consumed alcohol while driving and therefore would have had residual alcohol in her mouth at the time she blew the roadside test, a fact that would have made the Fail reading on the roadside breathalyzer unreliable.  Just prior to the second day of trial , the Crown decided to terminate the prosecution against the client by entering a stay of proceedings to all the charges.  Not guilty.  Client did not testify.   


Related Stories

The Queen v. D.(D.) 2019

The client was pulled over just outside of Hinton, Alberta driving a rental SUV.  Upon approaching the window, the officer smelled what he referred to as “fresh marihuana” and arrested the client on that basis.  A search of the interior of the vehicle revealed a large...

read more

The Queen v. B.(C.) 2019

The client was charged with sexual assault on a person under the age of 16 after the neighbor girl reported that the client had briefly touched her private areas over her clothing.  The client was 80 years old at the time, was highly intoxicated at the time of the...

read more

The Queen v. D.(M.) 2019

The police in Revelstoke were called after a concerned citizen reported that she observed a vehicle that appeared to be intentionally hitting construction zone pylons on the side of the road.  The police found the vehicle and pulled it over.  One thing led to another,...

read more


Call 1.877.212.9645

Or fill out the form below to receive a free and confidential initial consultation.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.