Google 4.8 ★ | CALL ME (24/7) 1-877-212-9645
The police attended the client’s home near Nakusp, BC to check on the well being of a woman that the police had received concerning phone calls about.  While standing at the front door to the residence, the police officer was able to speak with the woman and determine that she was fine, however while standing at the door he smelled the odour of what he referred to as “vegetative marihuana”.  The officer returned to the police station and drafted an Information to Obtain (“ITO”) a search warrant for the house on the basis of the smell of marihuana.  The next day the police executed the warrant and discovered a modestly sized indoor marihuana grow operation.  The client as well as two other people living in the house were charged with production of marihuana and possession for the purpose of trafficking.  At trial Mr. van der Walle argued that the grounds set out out by the officer in the ITO were insufficient and did not give rise to reasonable and probable grounds, which is the standard that needs to be met to obtain a search warrant.  Specifically, the officer had failed to set out his experience and how he is able to reliably distinguish between the odour of growing marihuana plants versus the odour of dried “bud” marihuana and the odour of smoked marihuana.  After hearing argument the Supreme Court Judge agreed with the defence and ruled that the warrant was invalid.  At that point the prosecutor, much to his credit, decided that it was likely that the illegally obtained evidence would be excluded and opted to drop the charges.  Not guilty.  Client did not testify.

Archives

Related Stories

The Queen v. S.(B.) 2020

The client was charged with two counts of uttering death threats after a young man and his father complained to the police in Port Coquitlam that the client and his "business partner" had left threatening voicemails for them over a drug debt that allegedly had been...

read more

The Queen v. D.(S.) 2020

 The client was charged with sexual assault and sexual interference after the daughter of his long time girlfriend told police that during her summer trip the prior year to visit her mother and the client, the client had fondled her breasts and touched her vagina. ...

read more

The Queen v. E.(C.) 2019

The client was pulled over in the early morning hours in Kelowna .  The police observed an open can of beer in the centre console and detected an odour of alcohol on the client's breath.  A roadside breath demand was made and the client blew a fail.  After that he was...

read more

REQUEST A FREE CONSULTATION

Call 1.877.212.9645

Or fill out the form below to receive a free and confidential initial consultation.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.