Bad IRP Decision? What Can You Do About It?
Bad IRP Decision? What Can You Do About It?
Drivers who are caught driving under the influence by the police may receive an Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) on driving. An IRP is a temporary driving suspension that prevents the recipient from driving for a set period of time as punishment for driving under the influence of alcohol. IRPs are designed to help make the roads safer from those who habitually violate the rules of the road; however, they can greatly disrupt the lives of the recipients.
If you have received an IRP, an adjudicator will review your case to determine if the IRP was proper. If you lose the review you can appeal the adjudicator’s decision. This article briefly describes the appeals process to help prepare you for what to expect if you need to appeal your case to the Supreme Court of British Columbia.
The Right of Judicial Review in British Columbia
In BC, all IRP recipients have the right to appeal an adjudicator’s ruling if they choose to do so. To file an appeal from a negative adjudication in British Columbia, a person must file a petition to the Supreme Court of British Columbia. Correctly filing the petition is very important to preserve the right of appeal, and so IRP recipients are encouraged to hire a criminal defense lawyer to ensure that the petition is filed properly.
How the Judges Will Review the Appeal
As a rule, no new issues of fact can be raised on appeal; however, to some extent, a criminal defendant can dispute the facts in question. The adjudicator’s decision is reviewed on a standard of reasonableness, not a standard of correctness. This is significant. This means that the judge hearing the appeal (or more accurately “the petition”) will look over the adjudicator’s decision to determine if: 1) the conclusion reached by the adjudicator was within the range of reasonable conclusions they could reach based on the evidence before them and 2) that the adjudicator’s reasoning was reasonable and logical. This means that so long as the evidence could have led the adjudicator to the conclusion they came to, the court will defer to the adjudicator and refuse to intervene and overturn their decision just because they may have reached a different conclusion based on the same evidence. They will only overturn the decision of the conclusion is totally unreasonable, not merely because they may disagree with it and they may have decided the issue differently had they been the adjudicator.
Unfortunately, it is difficult to predict what the judges of the Supreme Court will believe is “reasonable.” A ruling is not unreasonable simply because the petitioner disagrees with the decision. Instead, a ruling is reasonable if it had a legal justification if the decision’s reasoning was transparent, and if the decision was intelligible.
As a result, the determination of whether a ruling was reasonable will depend on the circumstances of the case. The appellate judges will decide, for example, whether the adjudicator misapplied the burden of proof, whether the adjudicator made an error of law, or whether the adjudicator had illogical reasoning.
Appeal for a Stay of the Driving Prohibition
Often, a driving prohibition will begin to apply before the petition is heard in court and the BC Supreme Court Judge gives their decision. This is particularly common with IRPs. If you have a good reason to believe that you will win your case, then you can apply to stay your driving prohibition until the outcome of your appeal/petition.
Should I Hire a Criminal Defense Attorney?
Attorneys can help you navigate courtroom procedure and ensure that your appeal is correctly filed. Also, because an appeal centers on issues of law rather than issues of fact, it is important to hire an advocate who knows the law and can properly argue a case on a valid appealable issue. While many commonly-cited studies show that the winning percentages for unrepresented parties at the initial hearing are low, the winning percentages for unrepresented parties on appeal is even lower. It is never too late to hire an attorney to assist in your appeal, and you always have a right to representation in court.
Many in Canada often associate drugs with crime, and in many cases, the possession or use of drugs is itself a crime. More recently, a spotlight has been placed on drug-related incidents due to the opioid crisis afflicting the nation. Sociologists have spent...
As a whole, the Canadian justice system is very fair. The accused enjoy the right to be present and be heard in court, the right to remain silent, and the right to representation by legal counsel. That last right is one of the most important rights of all. This...
Roadblocks are a tool commonly used by the police in Canada to detect traffic infractions and alcohol violations on a large scale. In most cases, drivers will see roadblocks set up on major roads on holiday weekends or late at night around the time when bars begin to...